Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12378
Record ID: f962bca9-c092-426b-93c1-4f6d4d30bb65
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSnow Jones, Alisonen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:59:31Zen
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:59:31Zen
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citation15 (6), June 2000en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12378en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectPerpetrator programsen
dc.subjectEconomic costsen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.titleThe cost of batterer programsen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2195en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesAttempts to assist the implementation of cost-effectiveness analyses of perpetrator treatment programmes by undertaking a cost analysis of four geographically and programmatically diverse batterer programmes. The US study found relatively low economic costs for perpetrator programmes across the four sites of US$22 to US$32 per session. Suggests that data from these analyses can be combined with effectiveness data to perform cost-effectiveness analyses and that such analyses can contribute to resolving the controversy about the provision of programmes for perpetrators, particularly the concern that such programmes divert scarce resources from services for women.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.date.entered2001-11-20en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing