Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12792 Record ID: fe077c53-68ab-45b9-860d-cb46597c6ffc
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lusk, Nikola | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:02:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:02:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 21 (2), Annual 2001 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 834041 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12792 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | University of Queensland Press | en |
| dc.subject | Human rights | en |
| dc.subject.other | Culturally and Linguistically Diverse / Migrant / Refugee communities | en |
| dc.title | When state silence become persecution: the case of domestic violence refugees in Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Khawar | en |
| dc.title.alternative | University of Queensland law journal | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 1939 | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | National | en |
| dc.subject.readinglist | Culturally and Linguistically Diverse / Migrant / Refugee communities | en |
| dc.description.notes | Sets out the facts and decision in the recent case of Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Khawar in which a denial by the Refugee Review Tribunal to grant a protection visa to a Pakistani woman was overturned by the Federal Court on the basis that the Tribunal had failed to consider whether State tolerance of violence against refugees amounted to persecution under Article 1A(2) of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. The leading judgement of Lindgren J and the dissent of Hill J are discussed and it is argued that the decision represents a broadening of the meaning of ‘persecution’ under the Convention to include less direct forms of State discrimination, making it possible for links to be drawn between individual experiences of domestic violence and persecution under the Convention as a member of a particular social group. It is noted, however, that the definition of a ‘particular social group’ remains unclear and that this will need to be addressed in any similar cases in the future. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | University of Queensland law journal | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2002-12-13 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.