Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15526
Record ID: cc1dc35a-9462-4ea5-91a8-d2897087415b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaltzman, Linda Een
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:19:47Zen
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:19:47Zen
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.citation19 (11), November 2004en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15526en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectSexual assaulten
dc.titleIssues related to defining and measuring violence against women: response to Kilpatricken
dc.title.alternativeJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1197en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThis article argues for the need of a strategy for choosing standardised definitions and measures concerning violence against women. In response to Kilpatrick’s comments, the author points to the importance of developing and using uniform terminology and discusses the lack of a formal mechanism to achieve this uniformity, and some difficulties associated with implementing Kilpatrick’s proposed changes to existing measures of rape and sexual assault.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.date.entered2005-06-07en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing