Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16817
Record ID: 09d55871-cf81-4465-99cf-06d328bc1e9e
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolt, Victoriaen
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Joanen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:28:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:28:31Z-
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.citation103 (2), February 2004en
dc.identifier.issn0029-7844en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16817-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologistsen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.titleScreening for partner violence: direct questioning or self-reporten
dc.title.alternativeObstetrics and gynecologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1521en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordQueenslanden
dc.description.notesOutlines the methodology and results of a Brisbane study aimed at testing the efficacy of direct questioning, using the Domestic Violence Initiative screening questions, versus self-report, using the self-report Maternity Social Support Scale, in identifying women experiencing intimate partner violence. Findings suggest the less confrontational mode of self-report was more conducive to detection of intimate violence than direct questioning although its applicability in a more general community setting is qualified. Recommends the use of the Maternity Social Support Scale to screen for domestic violence amongst women attending hospital-based maternity clinics.en
dc.identifier.sourceObstetrics and gynecologyen
dc.date.entered2004-04-23en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing