Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17539
Record ID: a4ed0c5a-3029-4c7c-ad48-1279cb1c016a
Type: Journal Article
Title: You can degrade but you can't hit: differences in perceptions of psychological versus physical aggression
Other Titles: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Authors: Arriaga, Ximena B
Capezza, Nicole M
Keywords: Psychological abuse;Measurement
Year: 2008
Publisher: Sage Publications
Citation: 25 (2), April 2008
Notes:  This [US] study fills two major gaps in the partner aggression literature. First, little is known about perceptions of psychological aggression. Second, it is unclear whether any physical aggression or just high physical aggression is perceived to be negative and severe. We conducted an experiment with college students (N = 212) to examine perceptions of a hypothetical marital conflict that varied the husband's level of physical aggression (absent, low, high) and psychological aggression (low, high). The effect of manipulating the husband's physical aggression led to robust main effects on perceptions of negativity and severity. The distinction between any versus low or high physical aggression depended on the variable. The effect of manipulating the husband's psychological aggression was not nearly as robust.
[? 2000-2008 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit SAGE Publications link.]
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/17539
ISSN: 1460-3608
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing