Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/11173 Record ID: 29089411-9250-490d-b334-763b881f660a
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Gondolf, Edward W | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T22:45:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T22:45:50Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2000 | en |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9780789011848 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/11173 | - |
| dc.format | xvi, 317 p. ;23 cm. | en |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Haworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Program evaluation and family violence research | en |
| dc.subject | Perpetrator programs | en |
| dc.subject | Perpetrators | en |
| dc.title | Human subject issues in batterer program evaluation | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Program evaluation and family violence research | en |
| dc.type | Book Chapter | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 5037 | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Chapter | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Book | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Book chapter | en |
| dc.description.notes | co-published as Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, Volume 4, Number 1 (#7) 2000<br/ >Discusses the major human subject issues raised in programme evaluations of perpetrator interventions and describes the ways in which these were addressed in a large, long-term perpetrator programme evaluation in the US. The main issues explored are obtaining informed consent from batterers and their partners, victim safety and tracking of female partners. It was found that while male consent might be biased by court-ordered programme expectations, female consent was determined by rapport with interviewers. Victims are at risk of harassment, threats, retaliation and stress for disclosing their partner’s behaviour. Interviewers should address the dangers derived from participating in the research and also the risks to women and children experiencing domestic violence, such as child abuse, suicide and assault by the perpetrator. Although long-term follow-up studies seeking women’s reports are required to evaluate the effectiveness of perpetrator programmes, follow-up interviews can violate a woman’s right to privacy, replicate stalking behaviours and endanger a woman. To properly address human subjects issues, uniform guidelines in the domestic violence field need to be developed. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Program evaluation and family violence research | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2003-07-04 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | New York | en |
| dc.description.physicaldescription | xvi, 317 p. ;23 cm. | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Book Chapters | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.