Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/11563
Record ID: cc58bc12-9d14-456a-a4f9-c83b82bc1535
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClearinghouse, Australian Family Relationshipsen
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Susanen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:48:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:48:34Z-
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.isbn9781921414503en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/11563-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralian Institute of Family Studiesen
dc.titleEnhancing access to family dispute resolution for families from culturally and linguistically diverse backgroundsen
dc.typeNon-Fictionen
dc.identifier.catalogid12496en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordDomestic Violence grey liten
dc.subject.keywordCALDen
dc.description.notes(FaHCSIA)—are required to be accessible, equitable and responsive. This includes engaging groups that may have barriers to access, such as families from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds (Attorney-General’s Department, 2007; FaHCSIA, 2006). Social equity and substantive justice are promoted by enabling all Australians, including those from CALD backgrounds, to benefit from and fully participate in universal beneficial services.This paper explores the extent to which federally funded family dispute resolution (FDR) services are accessible to families from CALD backgrounds. The paper draws extensively on literature identified for, and the findings of a qualitative research project, conducted by the author in a research partnership with CatholicCare Sydney and Anglicare. The project sought to develop a culturally responsive model of family dispute resolution. An important part of the project was to identify strategies that would facilitate greater access to, and participation in, family dispute resolution by individuals and families from culturally diverse backgrounds (Armstrong, 2010).The paper concludes that CALD families are not proportionally represented as FDR clients, and canvasses some reasons why they may not readily be using these services. Principles and practices are considered that may encourage access to FDR by CALD families and enhance their effective participation in its processes.en
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.publisher.placeMelbourneen
Appears in Collections:Books

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing