Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12152
Record ID: 53521da6-6cb5-4fa2-aee1-bbd45d25974a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFlower, Teresaen
dc.contributor.authorMullen, Paul Een
dc.contributor.authorPurcell, Rosemaryen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:58:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:58:00Z-
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.identifier.citationNo. 369en
dc.identifier.isbn9781921532191en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12152-
dc.format6pen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralian Institute of Criminologyen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectStalkingen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectImpact on children and young peopleen
dc.titleAdolescent stalking: offence characteristics and effectiveness of intervention ordersTrends and issues in crime and criminal justiceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid5533en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.aic.gov.au/documents/7/E/1/%7B7E12F419-B012-4CE4-9D79-45C819CE70D2%7Dtandi369.pdfen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordElectronic publicationen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/361-380/tandi369/view%20paper.aspxen
dc.description.notesGeneral Overview:This Australian empirical study examines the nature of stalking among adolescents, using a case study of applications for intervention orders against defendants aged 18 years or less in the Melbourne Children’s Court.<br/ ><br/ >Methodology: Between January 2004 and November 2006, 906 applications for intervention orders (IO) were processed in the Melbourne Children’s Court. A total of 299 applications met the study’s criteria for stalking, defined as multiple unwanted intrusions which persisted for two weeks or more. The researchers used court records to analyse the characteristics of the perpetrator and victim, the nature and duration of the stalking behaviour, and the effectiveness of the intervention order in curbing the perpetrator’s behaviour.<br/ ><br/ >Results: The majority of perpetrators were male (64%) and the majority of victims were female (69%). Almost all victims knew the perpetrator (98%), either as ex-school peers, family members, ex-intimate partners, former friends or neighbours.<br/ ><br/ >The main methods of stalking used by adolescents were unwanted approaches, phone calls, text messages and following. The vast majority of victims (75%) reported being threatened by the perpetrator, and 54% had been physically assaulted. The victims experienced anxiety and fear, an inability to concentrate in class, absenteeism and a decline in school performance, severe depression and suicidal ideation.<br/ ><br/ >Stalking most commonly occurred as an extension of bullying (28%). In 22% of cases, stalking occurred after the termination of an intimate or dating relationship, most often involving a male intruding upon a female, peer-aged victim (86%). Other types of offenders included retaliation stalkers, disorganised and disturbed stalkers, predatory stalkers and intimacy stalkers.<br/ ><br/ >Only 48% of IO applications were granted, with many victims discontinuing the application prior to the court hearing. Of the 145 applications which were granted, nine were subsequently breached.<br/ ><br/ ><i>Conclusions:</i/> The researchers concluded that while there are similarities between the behaviours of adult and adolescent stalkers, there are also some noticeable differences. Adolescent stalkers use more immediate and direct means of contact, and are more likely to make threats or assault their victims. Adolescent stalking is most likely to occur in the context of bullying, while stalking of ex-partners was less frequent than amongst adult offenders.<br/ ><br/ >While the breach rate was low, this figure may be distorted by the time period of the study, as well as the fact that many applicants did not proceed with their IO applications in the first place.<br/ ><br/ ><i>Recommendations</i/>: The researchers concluded that adolescent stalking should be taken more seriously. Additional research is needed on the impact of stalking on juvenile victims and ways of providing court support to IO applicants. Longitudinal studies of youth stalkers and their rates off offending in adulthood, and comparative studies of recidivism rates among defendants who receive an IO and those who do not, would also be helpful.en
dc.date.entered2009-07-17en
dc.publisher.placeCanberraen
dc.description.physicaldescription6 p.en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing