Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12183
Record ID: 1a01bff0-0233-4d73-a7cb-78de6aac58cc
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Annaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:58:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:58:13Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citation33 (1), 2000en
dc.identifier.issn0004-8658en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12183-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherPublished for the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology by Butterworthsen
dc.subjectProtection ordersen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.titleWho are the respondents of domestic violence protection orders?en
dc.title.alternativeAustralian and New Zealand journal of criminologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2404en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordQueenslanden
dc.subject.keywordDuplicateen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThis study examined a sample of both male and female respondents of applications for domestic violence protection orders in Queensland. In particular, comparisons were made between respondents of single applications and respondents of multiple applications. While protection orders seem to give women some form of security for the most part, respondents of multiple applications are those men who continue to terrorise and inflict violence on women. These men should be targeted for further attention by both the criminal justice system and behaviour modification programmes.en
dc.identifier.sourceAustralian and New Zealand journal of criminologyen
dc.date.entered2000-09-28en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing