Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12221
Record ID: 5bc43ace-eb0c-4036-aca5-7367efb22366
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrye, Victoriaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:58:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:58:28Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citation35 (8), 2007en
dc.identifier.issn0090-4392en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12221-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley Interscienceen
dc.subjectCommunity attitudesen
dc.subjectPreventionen
dc.titleThe informal social control of intimate partner violence against women: exploring personal attitudes and perceived neighborhood social cohesionen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Community Psychologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid541en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThis research explores how geographic community and neighbourhood characteristics influence the distribution of intimate partner violence (IPV) by examining mixed-methods interviews of 119 residents in a metropolitan US city. The interviews examined informal social control:, of the likelihood that a person would intervene; perception or social cohesion and neighbourhood factors; attitudes towards IPV; attitudes towards violence generally; and self-efficacy to intervene. Results indicated that self-efficacy to intervene was associated with likelihood to intervene in situations of IPV; neither perceived social cohesion nor involvement in the neighbourhood was associated with likelihood to intervene. The discussion addresses applications of the results to prevention theories and practice.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Community Psychologyen
dc.date.entered2011-04-29en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing