Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12254
Record ID: cd85f5a8-652c-4253-9cf9-ba80d677cb6f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Jen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:58:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:58:41Z-
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.citationNo 1 Vol.: 31en
dc.identifier.issn0277-5395en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12254-
dc.formatPages 53-64en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleThe ideology of choice. Overstating progress and hiding injustice in the lives of young women: Findings from a study in North Queensland, Australiaen
dc.title.alternativeWomen Stud Int Forumen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2007.11.001<Goen
dc.identifier.catalogid12425en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.relation.urltoen
dc.relation.urlISI>://000253647400005en
dc.description.notesThe pervasive and popularised concept of a freshly modernised and progressive world for girls and young women has been ushered in by theories of post-industrial individualisation, neo-liberalism and its dovetailing with liberal variants of feminism. Such optimistic notions of new-found freedom for women in Western democracies celebrate the shrinking of imposed constraints and exclusions and the enthusiastic endorsement of individual choice. This article reports on recently completed empirical research in an Australian context which questions just how dramatically the lives of young women have changed. It identifies the role that the lauded concept of choice plays in overstating women's advancement and disguising socially generated inequality. In particular, young women in this study comprehend domestic violence, unequal parenting and housework as matters of choice, while also implicitly understanding that they do not live up to the imagined unencumbered rational choice individuals of liberalism.The implications of an invigorated conservative, masculinist agenda disguised in a women's rights discourse are discussed. Feminists are confronted with a changed socio-political climate where the subordination of girls and women is allowed to occur more covertly within a framework of ostensible commitment to equality, the valorisation of choice and through seductive incitements to individual responsibility. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br/ >Electronic Resource Number:<br/ >DOI 10.1016/j.wsif.2007.11.001<br/ >Author's Address:<br/ >Baker, JJames Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Arts & Social Sci, Dept Social Work & Community Welf, Townsville, Qld, AustraliaJames Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Arts & Social Sci, Dept Social Work & Community Welf, Townsville, Qld, AustraliaJames Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Arts & Social Sci, Dept Social Work & Community Welf, Townsville, Qld, Australia<br/ >269KHTimes Cited:17Cited References Count:62en
dc.identifier.sourceWomen's studies international forumen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 53-64en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing