Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12306
Record ID: e69550ed-8164-4983-94ef-0502cc52a3a8
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChisholm, Richarden
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Jenniferen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:59:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:59:02Z-
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.citation20 (1), Summer 2007-2008en
dc.identifier.issn0817-6531en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12306-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherFamily Law Section - Law Council of Australiaen
dc.subjectLegislation analysisen
dc.subjectImpact on children and young peopleen
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.titleShared care and children's best interests in conflicted separation: a cautionary tale from current research.en
dc.title.alternativeAustralian Family Lawyeren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid643en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesGeneral Overview: Following the introduction of the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006:, the authors of this Australian article provide new data on the emotional well being of children and consider the implications of substantially shared care arrangements where parents are in continuing conflict.<br/ ><br/ >General Overview: Former judge of the Family Court, Richard Chisholm, and Child Clinical psychologist, Jennifer McIntosh, argue that family law professionals should focus on social science, as well as legislation, when attempting to negotiate or establish post-separation care arrangements. The paper presents findings of two reports exploring the impacts of Family Court and community based dispute resolution interventions for parents experiencing significant conflict:<br/ ><br/ >The authors discuss the psychological theory regarding the shared care of young children, before placing this into the context of the legislation and the ‘paramount consideration’ principle. The article concludes by summarising the discussion and outlining the implications for policy and practice.en
dc.identifier.sourceAustralian Family Lawyeren
dc.date.entered2009-12-11en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing