Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12366
Record ID: b30f690a-a9d0-4255-a4b9-b063380ad033
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAustin, Juliet Ben
dc.contributor.authorDankwort, Juergenen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T22:59:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T22:59:26Z-
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.identifier.citation14 (2), February 1999en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12366-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.titleStandards for batterer programs: a review and analysisen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2380en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notes"This article is a revised and updated version of a document prepared for the Violence Against Women Electronic Network (VAWnet)", which may also be found on the Research and Resources database under the title 'A Review of Standards for Batterer Intervention Programs' by Juliet Austin and Juergen Dankwort.<br/ >Systematically reviews standards regulating batterer interventions in 37 jurisdictions in the USA in terms of their status (complete / draft / in development) and type (voluntary or mandatory; perceived legitimacy; inclusiveness; how compliance achieved). There was considerable similarity in the topics addressed, but typically a rationale for inclusion or exclusion of particular content was not provided. Victim safety was explicitly identified in 81% of standards as the essential primary focus of batterer programmes. Holding the batterer accountable was a priority in 86%. Identifies some areas for further development, including standards for women mandated to treatment; appropriate interventions with gay and lesbian clients; culturally sensitive interventions; improving collaborative functioning of the justice system with the standards; economic and effective ways of monitoring compliance with standards; additional research on treatment outcomes and on the effectiveness of the standards.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.date.entered2000-10-31en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing