Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12510
Record ID: e432e5b0-aff8-4339-b708-7974a8af5eda
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBradfield, Rebeccaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:00:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:00:23Z-
dc.date.issued2001en
dc.identifier.citation13 (2), November 2001en
dc.identifier.issn1034-5329en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12510-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Sydney, Institute of Criminologyen
dc.subjectHomicideen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.titleWomen who kill: lack of intent and diminished responsibility as the other 'defences' to spousal homicideen
dc.title.alternativeCurrent issues in criminal justiceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2010en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordTasmaniaen
dc.description.notesDiscusses the methodology and results of a study which examined the partial defences of substantial abnormality of mind and lack of intent in 32 female and 72 male spousal homicide cases heard in the NSW Supreme Court. The first section attempts to contexualise the study, highlighting the incidence and prevalence of spousal homicide and the gendered nature of the offence. The outcomes of each of the cases are then outlined and the defences examined from a feminist perspective. Lack of the requisite mental state for murder is identified as the most commonly used defence in spousal homicide cases where the offender is female and it is suggested that this emphasis on irrationality and pathology silences the experiences of women who kill violent partners. By obscuring women’s motive of self-preservation, the defences of abnormality of mind and lack of intent ‘psychologise’ women and portray them as victims, denying them the opportunity of arguing their actions were rational and in self-defence. It is argued that some of these difficulties may be alleviated if the prosecution were to allow the defence of self-defence to be raised in response to not only murder, but manslaughter charges.en
dc.identifier.sourceCurrent issues in criminal justiceen
dc.date.entered2002-07-19en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing