Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12600
Record ID: f4a535a1-86bd-4702-88a5-09697a0e81d0
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGondolf, Edward Wen
dc.contributor.authorBeeman, Angie Ken
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:00:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:00:57Z-
dc.date.issued2003en
dc.identifier.citation9 (3), March 2003en
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12600-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.titleWomen's accounts of domestic violence versus tactics-based outcome categoriesen
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1821en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThe identification of the most dangerous perpetrators of domestic violence has been central in recent research. Abusive incidents are categorised to predict reabuse and reaussault among batterers. This study argues that prediction research has been unable to actually predict violence because of methodology weaknesses. The authors examined the narratives of domestic violence incidents to expose the need for further categorisations and identify inconsistencies between tactics-based and account-based categorisations. The female partners of men attending batterers programmes in four cities in the United States were periodically interviewed for a period of 15 months. The findings revealed that tactic-based outcome categories do not necessarily represent persistent abuse and assault.en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2003-05-23en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing