Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12620
Record ID: 217cb6c2-8a16-4879-90de-73d708c8d65f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Nicoleen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:01:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:01:05Z-
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citation35, December 2011en
dc.identifier.issn1320-0968en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12620-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSocio-Legal Research Centre, Griffith Universityen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectIndigenous issuesen
dc.subjectWelfareen
dc.subjectAdvocacyen
dc.subjectRegional rural and remote areasen
dc.titleThe Northern Territory Emergency Response - has it really improved the lives of Aboriginal women and children?en
dc.title.alternativeAustralian Feminist Law Journalen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid425en
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThis article critically discusses the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) and the contrasting opinions either in support or against the NTER in relation to the outcomes for Indigenous women and children. The author first provides an overview of the NTER. This discussion is followed by an overview of the different, primarily female leaders, perspectives criticising or supporting the NTER. The author concludes by discussing how the NTER perpetuates the invisibility of Aboriginal women’s rights and government control of Aboriginal women.en
dc.identifier.sourceAustralian feminist law journalen
dc.date.entered2012-02-02en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing