Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12643
Record ID: 1d4175bc-5439-45f1-b493-a5a4fb040761
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWadham, Benen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:01:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:01:13Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citation(2), Winter 2000en
dc.identifier.issn1324-4264en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12643-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherDomestic Violence & Incest Resource Centreen
dc.subjectMen as victimsen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.titleThe myth of male violence?en
dc.title.alternativeDomestic Violence & Incest Resource Centre Newsletteren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2313en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordVictoriaen
dc.description.notesReviews recent literature and research claiming female domestic violence is as prevalent as male violence and argues that the methodologies used to reach these findings were flawed. While male victims of domestic violence are as entitled to support and safety as female victims, denying that women are at a much greater risk only serves to perpetuate existing power relations. Suggests that what is needed is a framework for understanding the epidemiology of male and female violence so that we may work towards challenging dominant masculine values.en
dc.identifier.sourceDomestic Violence & Incest Resource Centre Newsletteren
dc.date.entered2001-03-29en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing