Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12688
Record ID: 6a375a1f-be0e-41da-9862-ef377feaf039
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Behrens, Juliet | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:01:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:01:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | (2), June 1997 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1327-5550 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12688 | - |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | CASA House (Centre Against Sexual Assault) | en |
dc.subject | Family law | en |
dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
dc.title | Violence and the family court: briefing on Doherty | en |
dc.title.alternative | Women against violence : an Australian feminist journal | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 2470 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.keyword | National | en |
dc.description.notes | There is increasing acknowledgment of family violence and its relevance to family law issues. This article provides a brief of the outcome of 'Doherty' where a husband was awarded 35% of property, and the wife 65%. The trial judge recognised the relevance of the husband’s violent behaviour towards his wife and children when assessing the distribution of property. Discusses the implications of the ruling. It represents a change from previous approaches taken by the courts, which have viewed family violence as irrelevant. | en |
dc.identifier.source | Women against violence : an Australian feminist journal | en |
dc.date.entered | 2000-07-08 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.