Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12729
Record ID: 41a05206-003f-4ba9-8e03-8c9a3ba1d0bf
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCobley, Cathyen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:01:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:01:48Z-
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.citation(20), 2006en
dc.identifier.issn1360-9939en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12729-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.subjectChild protectionen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.titleThe quest for truth: substantiating allegations of physical abuse in criminal prosecutions and care proceedingsen
dc.title.alternativeInternational journal of law, policy, and the familyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid952en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThis UK article examines the concept of proof and looks at the challenges in substantiating allegations of physical abuse in criminal prosecutions and care proceedings in England and Wales in the context of child abuse. The aim is to consider the relationship between the 2 kinds of proceedings (criminal prosecution and child protection proceedings) with their respective objectives of punishment and protection. Literature review, international law and case decisions are considered. When an allegation of child abuse is contested, the conflict has to be resolved before the punitive or protective mechanism can be applied. Proving abuse in legal proceedings with 2 key factors (the facts that have to be proved and the standard to which the facts have to be proved) in order to determine the outcome when allegations of child abuse are disputed, are discussed. Issues of causation and expert medical evidence are reviewed, along with discussion of case law in the UK. It concludes that recent developments may have blurred the distinction between the 2 systems (criminal prosecutions and the care and child protection proceedings), however, their respective different objectives remain, and justifies their conflicting or inconsistent outcomes.en
dc.identifier.sourceInternational journal of law, policy, and the familyen
dc.date.entered2007-03-15en
dc.publisher.placeNew Yorken
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing