Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12763
Record ID: 90242377-555b-415d-be73-b86a81bad728
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHeenan, Melanieen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:02:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:02:01Z-
dc.date.issued2005en
dc.identifier.citation5, January 2005en
dc.identifier.issn1448-8140en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12763-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralian Institute of Family Studiesen
dc.subjectLegislation analysisen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectSexual assaulten
dc.subjectPolicingen
dc.titleSexual offences law and procedureen
dc.title.alternativeAware : Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault newsletteren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1250en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://aifs.gov.au/resources/practice-guides/acssa-awareen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordVictoriaen
dc.description.notesRepresenting the Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault (ACCSA), Heenan reviews the Victorian Law Reform Commission’s final report into Sexual Offences: Law and Procedure:and also considers the Sexual Offences Interim Report:. Drawing on the final report’s 201 recommendations, the article discusses three key areas relevant to adult sexual assault: the police response; cross-examination by the accused; and specialisation within the legal system. In both the preliminary and final reports, the Commission suggested extensive changes to the structure and content of police training, especially for detectives. While receiving a majority of submissions calling for changes to the law which allows defendants to cross-examine complainants, the Commission weighed against them the opposing views of the Victorian Bar and the Criminal Bar Association, but ultimately proposed that the accused be prohibited form cross-examining the complainant. In the area of specialisation, the Interim Report:advances the creation of a specialist stand-alone court and/or specialist lists operating within an existing court structure, but the final report suggests that a pilot specialist list be trialed only in cases of child sexual assault due to limited resources.en
dc.identifier.sourceAware : Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault newsletteren
dc.date.entered2005-04-09en
dc.publisher.placeMelbourneen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing