Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12795 Record ID: 456d4046-228d-4abe-b854-531ff2c8e1a8
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Glasziou, Paul | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Hegarty, Kelsey L | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:02:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:02:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | No 9805 Vol.: 378 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1406736 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12795 | - |
| dc.format | Pages 1760-2 | en |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Limited | en |
| dc.title | Tackling domestic violence: is increasing referral enough? | en |
| dc.title.alternative | The Lancet | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 12232 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | https://search.proquest.com/docview/906850646?accountid=12763 | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Education, medical, continuing | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Womens health | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Referral & Consultation | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Primary Health Care | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Domestic Violence - prevention & control | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Health | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Domestic violence | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Female | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Medical research | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Duplicate | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Primary care | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://sirius.library.unsw.edu.au:9003/sfx_local?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=unknown&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Ahealthcompleteshell&atitle=Tackling+domestic+violence%3A+is+increasing+referral+enough%3F&title=The+Lancet&issn=01406736&date=2011-11-19&volume=378&issue=9805&spage=1760&au=Hegarty%2C+Kelsey%3BGlasziou%2C+Paul&isbn=&jtitle=The+Lancet&btitle=&rft_id=info:eric/ | en |
| dc.description.notes | Despite the intensive intervention and its statistically significant effect, across every practice (of around 3000 patients), disclosures of abuse per practice increased from five women in the control group to 25 women in the intervention group, but the recorded referrals to agencies difference was from almost zero in the control group to just nine women in the intervention group. Tackling the hidden yet major public health problem of intimate-partner violence is troublesome.9 The two major responses proposed of screening and case finding in health settings have only been sparsely assessed.9 Systematic reviews have called for more research into screening because evidence to recommend for or against screening is insufficient.10 A recently completed screening trial showed no benefits for women's health outcomes in screened versus non-screened women.11 The rigorous case finding trial in The Lancet4 advances our knowledge about the intensiveness that is required to change clinicians' behaviour.<br/ >Copyright - Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 19-Nov 25, 2011Document feature - Photographs; ReferencesLast updated - 2013-02-22CODEN - LANCAO1 Plsek P, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 2001; 323: 625-28.2 Vos T, Astbury J, Piers LS, et al. Measuring the impact of intimate partner violence on the health of women in Victoria, Australia. Bull World Health Organ 2006; 84: 739-44.3 Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Lancet 2006; 368: 1260-69.4 Feder G, Agnew Davies R, Baird K, et al. Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; published online Oct 13. DOI: S0140- 6736(11)61179-3.5 Ramsay J, Carter Y, Davidson L, et al. Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3: CD005043.6 TaftA, Hegarty K. Intimate partner violence against women: what outcomes are meaningful? JAMA 2010; 304: 577-79.7 Sohal H, Eldridge S, Feder G. The sensitivity and specificity of four questions (HARK) to identify intimate partner violence: a diagnostic accuracy study in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2007; 8: 49.8 Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655.9 Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-113, 137-347.10 Nelson HD, Nguyen P, McInerney Y, Klein J. Screening women and elderly adults for family and intimate partner violence: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 382-86.11 MacMillan HL, Wathen CN, Jamieson E, et al. Screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 302: 493-501.12 Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Method 2006, 6: 54.Brown, Celia A; Lilford, Richard J. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC medical research methodology, 6. (2006): 54Craig, Peter; Dieppe, Paul; Macintyre, Sally; Mitchie, Susan; et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337. 7676 (2008): 979-983. BMJ Publishing GroupFeder, Gene; Davies, Roxane Agnew; Baird, Kathleen; Dunne, Danielle; et al. Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 378. 9805 (2011): 1788-1795. The Lancet Publishing GroupFeder, G.; Ramsay, J.; Dunne, D.; Rose, M.; et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 13. 16 (2009): 1-27,29-37,39-45,47-77,79,81-113,III,IV,XI,XII,XIII. GRAY PUBLISHINGGarcia-Moreno, Claudia; Jansen, Henrica A. F. M.; Ellsberg, Mary; Heise, Lori; et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. LANCET, 368. 9543 (2006): 1260-1269. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INCMacMillan, Harriet L.; Wathen, C. Nadine; Jamieson, Ellen; Boyle, Michael H.; et al. Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in Health Care Settings A Randomized Trial. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIA[cut] | en |
| dc.identifier.source | The lancet | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2014-07-21 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | London | en |
| dc.description.physicaldescription | Pages 1760-2 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.