Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12802
Record ID: b68c3f2e-8d62-42c6-927d-65ff61b62d00
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLaster, Kathyen
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Rogeren
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:02:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:02:18Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citation7 (1-3), 2000en
dc.identifier.issn2697580en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12802-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherA B Academic Publishersen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.titleTreating spousal violence 'differently'en
dc.title.alternativeInternational review of victimologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2178en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordVictoriaen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesProvides a brief background to the development of criminal justice responses to domestic violence before presenting the methodology and results of a Melboune, Victoria study aimed at ascertaining whether there is a parity of treatment, within the criminal justice system, of victims of spousal assault and victims of acquaintance or stranger assault. The findings and analysis reveal there is little difference in how intimate and non-intimate assaults are processed by the courts, but that police do tend to prosecute the latter more vigorously. Other differences which were identified, such as higher rates of case withdrawal and/or loss of information in domestic cases, were of either borderline or non-significance statistically. It is highlighted, however, that statistical non-relationships should not be confused with substantive non-relationships and that the various limitations of the study may have impacted on its results. Concludes that the study provides a warning against feminist empiricism and that a realization of the laws transformative potential can only be achieved by challenging the dominance of hegemonic interests in law and policy at a grass roots level.en
dc.identifier.sourceInternational review of victimologyen
dc.date.entered2001-12-11en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing