Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12895
Record ID: 837ab760-3eea-45e4-b258-151816446559
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPearce, D. Cen
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Ren
dc.contributor.authorCadilhac, D Aen
dc.contributor.authorMagnus, Aen
dc.contributor.authorSheppard, Len
dc.contributor.authorCumming, T. Ben
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:02:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:02:55Z-
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citationVol.: 11en
dc.identifier.issn14712458en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12895-
dc.languageenen
dc.titleThe societal benefits of reducing six behavioural risk factors: an economic modelling study from Australiaen
dc.title.alternativeBmc Public Healthen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-483<Goen
dc.identifier.catalogid12390en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordDomestic violenceen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.relation.urltoen
dc.relation.urlhttps://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-11-483.pdfen
dc.relation.urlISI>://WOS:000293326800001en
dc.description.notesBackground: A large proportion of disease burden is attributed to behavioural risk factors. However, funding for public health programs in Australia remains limited. Government and non-government organisations are interested in the productivity effects on society from reducing chronic diseases. We aimed to estimate the potential health status and economic benefits to society following a feasible reduction in the prevalence of six behavioural risk factors: tobacco smoking; inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption; high risk alcohol consumption; high body mass index; physical inactivity; and intimate partner violence. Methods: Simulation models were developed for the 2008 Australian population. A realistic reduction in current risk factor prevalence using best available evidence with expert consensus was determined. Avoidable disease, deaths, Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and health sector costs were estimated. Productivity gains included workforce (friction cost method), household production and leisure time. Multivariable uncertainty analyses and correction for the joint effects of risk factors on health status were undertaken. Consistent methods and data sources were used. Results: Over the lifetime of the 2008 Australian adult population, total opportunity cost savings of AUD2,334 million (95% Uncertainty Interval AUD1,395 to AUD3,347; 64% in the health sector) were found if feasible reductions in the risk factors were achieved. There would be 95,000 fewer DALYs (a reduction of about 3.6% in total DALYs for Australia); 161,000 less new cases of disease; 6,000 fewer deaths; a reduction of 5 million days in workforce absenteeism; and 529,000 increased days of leisure time. Conclusions: Reductions in common behavioural risk factors may provide substantial benefits to society. For example, the total potential annual cost savings in the health sector represent approximately 2% of total annual health expenditure in Australia. Our findings contribute important new knowledge about productivity effects, including the potential for increased household and leisure activities, associated with chronic disease prevention. The selection of targets for risk factor prevalence reduction is an important policy decision and a useful approach for future analyses. Similar approaches could be applied in other countries if the data are available.<br/ >Electronic Resource Number:<br/ >10.1186/1471-2458-11-483<br/ >Times Cited: 2Cadilhac, Dominique A. Magnus, Anne Sheppard, Lauren Cumming, Toby B. Pearce, Dora C. Carter, Roben
dc.identifier.sourceBMC public healthen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing