Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12900
Record ID: 10df9cca-e4a2-4888-b60a-bd062902a25a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHotaling, Gerald Ten
dc.contributor.authorByrne, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorBuzawa, Eveen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:02:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:02:57Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citation7, February 2007en
dc.identifier.issn14743310en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12900-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.subjectSpecialist courtsen
dc.subjectInteragency worken
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.titleUnderstanding the impact of prior abuse and prior victimization on the decision to forgo criminal justice assistance in domestic violence incidents: a life-course perspectiveen
dc.title.alternativeBrief treatment and crisis intervention.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid3107en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/btcint/en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.description.notesIn this US article, the authors identify the factors that make victims of domestic violence less likely to report re-victimisation, and make proposals for reform.<br/ ><br/ >Objective: This study was conducted in Quincy, Massachusetts, where the police, district attorney, probation system and judges have developed an integrated, best practice system of full enforcement of the law regarding domestic violence offences. The research investigated reasons for victims reporting and not reporting re-victimisation.<br/ ><br/ >Methods: The researchers drew on multiple sources of data: the results of a survey of 118 women who had been victims of offenders prosecuted in the Quincy court, along with information from the police, prosecution, court files, batterer treatment programs, criminal histories and civil restraining order registry.<br/ ><br/ >Results: Of the 118 women, 58 experienced a new incident but only 26 reported the incident. The authors found that the most important predictors of non-reporting are the victim's belief that she had no voice or rights with criminal justice officials; the victim having reported sexual abuse prior to age 18; the offender having been charged with a drug offence; a higher number of prior restraining orders against the offender; and a higher number of prior violence-related criminal charges.<br/ ><br/ >Conclusion: The authors suggest that a new approach is needed that does not rely on the victim's willingness to report. In this new approach, police would talk with offenders and directly monitor their behaviour, taking responsibility for detecting and reporting re-victimisation out of the hands of the victim. Offenders with substance abuse problems would have participation in treatment programs made a condition of community release, and compliance would be actively monitored. Victims, particularly those who have experienced serial abuse over a lifetime, would be offered more extensive psychological support and family crisis intervention. The authors suggest that integrated domestic violence courts dealing with criminal charges, restraining orders and family law matters, may improve service to victims. They note, however, that batterer programs have not yet proved effective.<br/ >[Permission to reprint abstract provided by OUP]en
dc.identifier.sourceBrief treatment and crisis interventionen
dc.date.entered2008-04-10en
dc.publisher.placeNew Yorken
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing