Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12919
Record ID: dcc238eb-be51-4f0b-9745-7bb8cb477d14
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Claire Aen
dc.contributor.authorWard, Tonyen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:03:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:03:05Z-
dc.date.issued2003en
dc.identifier.citationNo 4 Vol.: 34en
dc.identifier.issn19391323en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12919-
dc.formatPages 353en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleThe treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good livesen
dc.title.alternativeProfessional Psychology: Research and Practiceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid12079en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesHow would a good lives model of sex offender treatment differ from a risk-need model? In the good lives model, risk factors are viewed as obstacles that erode individuals’ capacities to live more fulfilling lives. The therapeutic focus is thus on implementing offenders’ good lives plans rather than simply managing risk. To develop our argument, we first outline the risk-need approach and briefly comment on its core assumptions. We then present the good lives model and discuss the clinical utility of an integrated approach by way of a case example.en
dc.identifier.sourceProfessional Psychology : Research and Practiceen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 353en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing