Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12937
Record ID: 823d077c-2899-4223-b74b-ba1c2d5244e4
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGondolf, Edward Wen
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Robert Jen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:03:12Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:03:12Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citation6 (2), February 2000en
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12937-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.title"Consumer" recommendations for batterers programsen
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1777en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThis study is a 'consumer-based' assessment of four batterer programmes that have been conducted for more than five years in the United States. It concentrates on the responses to an open-ended question that asks for suggestions for changing or improving the programme. Most of the 840 male participants of the multi-site research were court-mandated to the programmes. Around seventy per cent of the batterers (70.7%) and their partners (73%) responded to the programme modification question. However, only 14 per cent of the men and 13 per cent of the women made specific recommendations. Men suggested changes in content and counselling, and both men and women proposed structural changes and women involvement. White women and educated men were more likely to advise changes.en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2003-06-10en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing