Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12948
Record ID: 69e6f914-1efc-4b8a-b3fb-d9d7c4d756d4
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Anastasiaen
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Nicolaen
dc.contributor.authorHanley, Nataliaen
dc.contributor.authorLarcombe, Wendyen
dc.contributor.authorFileborn, Biancaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:03:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:03:16Z-
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationVol. 25, no. 5 ; pp. 611-629en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12948-
dc.languageenen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectRapeen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen
dc.subjectDefinitionsen
dc.title"I think it's rape and I think he would be found not guilty": Focus group perceptions of (un)reasonable belief in consent in rape lawen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid14612en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0964663916647442en
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesA legal definition of rape that exonerates an accused who 'reasonably believes in consent' is currently in force in a number of jurisdictions in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Limited research has investigated community and professional perceptions of the adequacy and scope of this definition of rape. This study analyses key themes from focus group discussions with professionals working in the sexual assault sector.en
dc.identifier.sourceSocial and Legal Studiesen
dc.date.entered2017-03-14en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing