Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12951
Record ID: c6072d29-b581-49db-8545-fd62883990b9
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIrwin, Lori Gen
dc.contributor.authorVarcoe, Colleenen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:03:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:03:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.citation27 (1), Spring 2004en
dc.identifier.issn0162-0436en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12951-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherHuman Sciences Pressen
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.subjectParentingen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectWelfareen
dc.subjectCALD (culturally and linguistically diverse)en
dc.subjectChild protectionen
dc.subjectImpact on children and young peopleen
dc.subjectService provisionen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.title"If I killed you, I'd get the kids": women's survival and protection work with child custody and access in the context of woman abuseen
dc.title.alternativeQualitative sociologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1175en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis article presents the results of a 3-year Canadian study of formal systems’ (criminal justice, social assistance, and health care) responses to child custody and access in the context of intimate partner violence. Interviews with 46 women indicate that, when leaving abusive partners, women’s work involved contradictory requirements of preserving the children’s relationships with, but at the same time protecting them from, their fathers. Interviews with 38 service providers and document analysis show how certain practices and policies sustain these contradictory requirements. Findings show that all women with children reported that their abusive partners used the children as part of the dynamics of abuse. Ex-partners threatened to harm or kill the children, or take the children away from the women. Language barriers, poverty and racism increased women’s work and problems experienced within formal systems. Formal systems provide opportunities for the abusive partner to continue to abuse the woman, through her children. These opportunities are made possible through 3 related reasons. Firstly, the dynamics of the violence against women and abuse by a partner did not inform the ways formal systems operated. Secondly, systems operated with a ‘child-centred’ ideology that focused on the well being of the child separately from the well being of the woman. Thirdly, gender biases disregarded gender-based violence which were consistent with certain views of mothering and fathering. Findings support the notion that gender analysis and accounting for violence in custody and access are essential to the safety of women and children.en
dc.identifier.sourceQualitative sociologyen
dc.date.entered2005-07-04en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing