"No Contact, Except . . ." Visitation Decisions in Protection Orders for Intimate Partner Abuse

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12964

Record ID: bb9c0593-92d2-4069-b04f-cdc8b3019a41

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Postel, Emily Bonistall	en
dc.contributor.author	Fleury-Steiner, Ruth E	en
dc.contributor.author	Miller, Susan L	en
dc.contributor.author	Maloney, Sara	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:03:23Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:03:23Z	-
dc.date.issued	2014	en
dc.identifier.citation	3 Nov 2014	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/12964	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	Sage Publications	en
dc.subject	Protection orders	en
dc.subject	Violence against women	en
dc.title	"No Contact, Except . . ." Visitation Decisions in Protection Orders for Intimate Partner Abuse	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	12718	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Visitation	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.description.notes	Examines factors relating to specific conditions of protection orders, specifically visitation. Examination is based on structured observations of family court protection order hearings involving women seeking orders against male partners. Implications for judicial training and systems adequacy discussed.	en
dc.identifier.source	Feminist Criminology	en
dc.date.entered	2014-11-11	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing