Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13075
Record ID: 0e65525c-d01a-4fa0-bef0-87163632ab43
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Geoffen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:04:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:04:06Z-
dc.date.issued2001en
dc.identifier.citation22 (2), 2001en
dc.identifier.issn0814723Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13075-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapyen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectOverviewen
dc.titleA critical response to the Keys Young report: 'ending domestic violence? programs for perpetrators'en
dc.title.alternativeThe Australian and New Zealand journal of family therapyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2068en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesProvides a critical analysis of constructions of domestic violence solely as a patriarchal practice, utilising the Keys Young report, 'Ending Domestic Violence? Programs for Perpetrators', as an example of the dangers of allowing one approach to domestic violence to dominate the political spectrum. Whilst acknowledging the role of the women’s movement in placing domestic violence on political agendas and the importance of maintaining a recognition of patriarchy as a major source of male-on-female violence, the author questions the viability of policies and intervention strategies which cannot adequately account for other forms of disadvantage and discrimination, such as poverty. Drawing upon Foucault’s analysis of discursive knowledge, the author suggests that to accept the dominant discourse as instructive is to silence alternative ones, thereby inhibiting greater insight and development. Advocates the funding and evaluation of a diversity of approaches to researching and working with violence in families such that the structural, social and personal complexity of intimate and family relationships might be adequately accounted for.en
dc.identifier.sourceThe Australian and New Zealand journal of family therapyen
dc.date.entered2002-04-09en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing