Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13205
Record ID: f797eca6-0526-467d-aace-2bca22f0f606
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHocking, Barbara Annen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:04:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:04:58Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citation64 (2), April 2000en
dc.identifier.issn0022-0183en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13205-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherPageant Publishingen
dc.subjectLegislation analysisen
dc.subjectPsychological abuseen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.titleA tale of two experts: the Australian High Court takes a cautious standen
dc.title.alternativeThe Journal of criminal lawen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1960en
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordWalesen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordNew South Walesen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesDiscusses the recent High Court decisions of two cases: Osland, in which the admissibility of expert evidence on battered woman syndrome (BWS) to assist in a defence of provocation was considered; and HG, a case involving the admissibility of evidence of prior sexual abuse under s 409B of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). The facts and issues of each case are outlined and it is suggested that central to both decisions was a relatively cautious approach to syndrome evidence. Problems posed by novel or emerging forms of psychological evidence, such as child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome, for juries and judges are explored and it is argued that across jurisdictions, an increased understanding between the law and various branches of science and psychology is needed.en
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of criminal lawen
dc.date.entered2002-10-08en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing