Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13238
Record ID: 1aa6580a-a376-4b1d-8339-63c3d701619a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNosek, Maraget Aen
dc.contributor.authorSwedlend, Nancyen
dc.contributor.authorMcFarlane, Judithen
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Rosemary Ben
dc.contributor.authorGroff, Janet Yen
dc.contributor.authorDolan Mullen, Patriciaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:05:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:05:10Z-
dc.date.issued2001en
dc.identifier.citation10 (9), 2001en
dc.identifier.issn1524-6094en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13238-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectCross-culturalen
dc.subjectDisabilityen
dc.titleAbuse assessment screen-disability (AAS-D): measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilitiesen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of women's health & gender-based medicineen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid693en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.readinglistPeople with disabilityen
dc.description.notesThe official publication of the Society for the Advancement of Women's Health Research<br/ >General Overview: In order to determine the frequency of abuse among disabled women, the AAS-D tool was developed because abuse tools that focus on intimate partner abuse do not detect abuse by a carer or healthcare provider. The results of this US study found that rates of abuse by an intimate partner are almost the same for disabled women as for able bodied women, the main factor differentiating them is the additional risk that disabled women face from their carers.<br/ ><br/ >Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, type and perpetrators of abuse towards women with physical disabilities.<br/ ><br/ >Method: Five specialty clinics in the US serving women with physical disabilities provided the setting for data collection. Researchers administered the AAS-D survey to 511 English and Spanish speaking women with a disability that limited one or more major life activities, including mobility and self care. Women were asked to self define their ethnic affiliation.<br/ ><br/ >Results: Fifty of the 511 women (9.8%) reported abuse within the last year. When the standard questions were asked, 40 women reported abuse, however when the two additional disability related questions were asked, a further ten or 2% of the population reported abuse. The 37 women defining themselves as other than black, white or Hispanic were more likely to report physical, sexual abuse or both. Of the ten women who reported disability related abuse, eight identified themselves as Caucasian. An intimate partner was the primary perpetrator of physical or sexual abuse. Disability related abuse was reported almost equally by an intimate partner, a care provider or a health professional.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion: The study was undertaken in an urban disabled clinic and replication in rural geographic areas, as well as in a more severely disabled clinic, is necessary to capture a more diverse group of women. The study relied on self-reporting which may result in under or over reporting, limiting the study results. There was no attempt to confirm these results independently or to validate the instrument itself. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates and documents the usefulness of an abuse assessment tool designed for women with physical disabilities. Using a traditional two question tool would have only detected 80% of the abused women.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of women's health & gender-based medicineen
dc.date.entered2009-05-15en
dc.subject.anrapopulationPeople with disabilityen
dc.publisher.placeInc.en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing