Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13386
Record ID: b3e2768e-a92d-420d-bb28-78b4a65c609c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith, M. Dwayneen
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Lane Kirklanden
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Tara Nen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:06:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:06:10Z-
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citation9 (1), January 2014en
dc.identifier.issn1557-0851en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13386-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectHomicideen
dc.subjectRepresentations of womenen
dc.titleAn examination of the media portrayal of femicide–suicides: an exploratory frame analysisen
dc.title.alternativeFeminist Criminologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2519en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesRecent research has been focused on the portrayal of intimate partner homicides in the news media with specific emphasis on the most commonly occurring type, femicides (the murder of a female intimate partner by a male intimate partner). One important finding in the analysis of intimate partner homicide is the striking number of femicides that are followed by perpetrator suicide. Whereas homicide followed by suicide is a rare occurrence in the context of crime generally, within the context of intimate partner homicide, femicide–suicide is common. The present research utilized content analysis to explore the media coverage of a near population of femicide–suicide cases in the North Carolina from 2002 to 2009 (n = 86). An examination of the article titles showed that the majority of titles (54%) assigned to the articles describe the crime as an ambiguous homicide or homicide–suicide and do not indicate the relationship between the perpetrator and victim. In comparison, results show that 78% of the articles' text defined the homicide–suicide as domestic violence. Specifically, in cases where the news coverage defined the femicide–suicide as domestic violence, the authors identified 4 media frames used (1) femicide–suicide by a male perpetrator, (2) femicide–suicide due to loss of perpetrator control, (3) femicide–suicide as a mercy killing, and (4) femicide–suicide due to jealousy. Implications for societal perceptions of violence against women as well as corresponding victims' policies/services are presented and discussed.<br/ >[?2014 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit <a href=" http://fcx.sagepub.com/" target="_blank">SAGE publications link.</a>]en
dc.identifier.sourceFeminist Criminologyen
dc.date.entered2014-06-16en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing