Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13425
Record ID: 9693c043-3cc4-42de-a9b4-74a157fb9381
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiesbrecht, Crystal J.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:06:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:06:26Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13425-
dc.description.abstractAlthough knowledge of the link between intimate partner violence (IPV) and animal maltreatment has increased significantly in recent years, few studies have examined service providers’ experiences with IPV and concurrent animal abuse, as well as animal safekeeping in situations of IPV. The present study documented human service and animal welfare service providers’ experiences supporting victims/survivors of IPV, who owned pets and livestock, and included service providers in rural and northern communities in Saskatchewan. Online surveys were completed by 128 human service professionals (including domestic violence shelter workers, domestic violence counsellors, victim services workers, police, and legal professionals) and 43 animal welfare professionals (including workers from animal rescues, humane societies, Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals [SPCAs], and veterinary clinics) (n = 171). Respondents shared information relating to their awareness of the link; their experiences responding in situations of IPV and concurrent animal abuse, including arranging animal safekeeping in situations of IPV; and successes and challenges related to effective service provision. Results include descriptions of intersecting risks to people and animals. Service providers shared ways that they have assisted victims/survivors who own animals, such as through animal safekeeping programs. Both human service and animal welfare professionals expressed the need for pet-friendly domestic violence shelters and pet-friendly long-term housing options. Service providers offered recommendations for improving education and training; improving provision of services of victims/survivors of IPV and their animals, including improving access to Emergency Intervention Orders and establishing funding for animal safekeeping in situations of IPV; and strengthening existing and building new partnerships.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Interpersonal Violenceen
dc.titleAnimal safekeeping in situations of intimate partner violence: Experiences of human service and animal welfare professionalsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211025037en
dc.identifier.catalogid16996en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 June 29en
dc.date.entered2021-06-28en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 June 29en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing