Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13448
Record ID: 07754034-d92b-431d-a48b-28c6379fc6b9
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaft, Angelaen
dc.contributor.authorFlood, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Kelsey Len
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:06:35Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:06:35Z-
dc.date.issued2001en
dc.identifier.citationNo 6 Vol.: 25en
dc.identifier.issn1326-0200en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13448-
dc.formatPages 498-500en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen
dc.titleAre men and women equally violent to intimate partners?en
dc.title.alternativeAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Healthen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doiAuthor's Address:en
dc.identifier.doiLa Trobe University, Victoria., a.taft@latrobe.edu.auen
dc.identifier.doiElectronic Resource Number:en
dc.identifier.doiViolence against women is a significant public health issue. One form of violence against women, intimate partner abuse or domestic violence, is prevalent in Australia. In this article, we summarise the main theoretical and methodological debates informing prevalence research in this area. We explain why studies finding equivalent victimisation and perpetration rates between the sexes are conceptually and methodologically flawed and why coercion and control are fundamental to the definition and measurement of partner abuse. We conclude that while male victims of partner abuse certainly exist, male victims of other forms of male violence are more prevalent. A focus on gendered risk of violence in public health policy should target male-to-male public violence and male-to-female intimate partner abuse.en
dc.identifier.doiDate revised - 2009-11-01Last updated - 2011-12-14SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - PSE, Australia; New Zealand; domestic violence; Public health; coercion; Females; malesen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00311.xen
dc.identifier.catalogid12248en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00311.xen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordFemalesen
dc.subject.keywordCoercionen
dc.subject.keywordDomestic violenceen
dc.subject.keywordMalesen
dc.subject.keywordNew Zealanden
dc.subject.keywordPolicyen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordDuplicateen
dc.subject.keywordPublic healthen
dc.relation.urlhttps://search.proquest.com/docview/21102642?accountid=12763en
dc.relation.urlhttp://sirius.library.unsw.edu.au:9003/sfx_local?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Ahealthsafetyabstracts&atitle=Are+men+and+women+equally+violent+to+intimate+partners%3F&title=Australian+and+New+Zealand+Journal+of+Public+Health&issn=13260200&date=2001-12-01&volume=25&issue=6&spage=498&au=Taft%2C+Angela%3BHegarty%2C+Kelsey[cut]en
dc.identifier.sourceAustralian and New Zealand journal of public healthen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 498-500en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing