Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13478
Record ID: 828c158b-3269-4068-974a-8916c34f098b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoodmark, Leighen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:06:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:06:46Z-
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 5, Issue 1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13478-
dc.description.abstractThe Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) has been hailed as the federal government's signature legislation responding to gender-based violence. VAWA, passed in 1994 and reauthorized three times since then, has created several new programs and protections for victims of gender-based violence. VAWA is, however, primarily a funding bill and what it primarily funds is the criminal legal system. But the criminal legal response to gender-based violence has not been effective in decreasing rates of gender-based violence or deterring violence. A VAWA that discontinued funding for the criminal legal system and instead focused on economics, prevention, and community-based resources—a noncarceral VAWA—could better meet the needs of victims of gender-based violence and target the underlying causes of that violence.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAnnual Reviewsen
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Review of Criminologyen
dc.titleAssessing the Impact of the Violence Against Women Acten
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-095322en
dc.identifier.catalogid17234en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.date.entered2022-03-08en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing