Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13576
Record ID: 0c2c5e4f-8613-4c7a-98d6-eb205dc81ffb
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Marilynen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:07:25Z-
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.identifier.citation6 (1), April 1999en
dc.identifier.issn1321-8719en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13576-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralian Academic Press : Samford Valleyen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.titleBattered women and bad science: the limited validity and utility of battered woman syndromeen
dc.title.alternativePsychiatry, Psychology and Lawen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1754en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesOutlines the key elements of Lenore Walker’s ‘battered woman syndrome’, explaining how the construct has been used in Australian legal and clinical contexts before addressing some of the major methodological and conceptual flaws in Walker’s research. The forensic use of battered woman syndrome in criminal cases is also discussed and some recent Australian cases in which the theory has been applied are used to illustrate the potential dangers of generalising Walkers findings across groups not included in her study, such as homosexual defendants and children. Concludes by challenging the necessity of expert testimony on battered woman syndrome and its utility as a mechanism for disabusing jury members of myths and stereotypes associated with domestic violence.en
dc.identifier.sourcePsychiatry, psychology, and lawen
dc.date.entered2003-06-24en
dc.publisher.placeQLDen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing