Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13578 Record ID: ec4afa2d-e34f-486e-bf28-8f64716b9abd
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Websdale, Neil | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:07:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:07:26Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 11 (9), September 2005 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1077-8012 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13578 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en |
| dc.subject | Homicide | en |
| dc.subject | Risk assessment | en |
| dc.subject | Screening | en |
| dc.subject | Prevention | en |
| dc.title | Battered women at risk: a rejoinder to Jacquelyn Hauser's and Jacquelyn Campbell's commentaries on “R & B” | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Violence against women | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 1127 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/28823.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.description.notes | This is in response to the commentaries by Hauser and Campbell with regard to the author’s fictionalised conversation over domestic violence fatality review. The commentators focused on different aspects. Hauser looked at the tensions between the researcher and the battered woman over battered women’s role in fatality review. Campbell looked at the issues raised about risk assessment. The author addresses issues raised in their commentaries. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Violence against women | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2005-09-21 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.