Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13603
Record ID: 897b0ea1-53d7-41a8-8bf6-d0f0303eada7
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Heise, Lori | en |
dc.contributor.author | Ellsberg, Mary | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:07:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:07:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | 359 (9317), May 4, 2002 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-6736 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13603 | - |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | J. Onwhyn | en |
dc.subject | Standards | en |
dc.subject | Overview | en |
dc.title | Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research | en |
dc.title.alternative | The Lancet | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 1995 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
dc.description.notes | Discusses some of the difficulties associated with applying and practising in accordance with established ethical principles in the field of domestic violence research, highlighting the significant danger that unethical practice in this area can create for women. The ethical and safety recommendations and guidelines developed by the WHO are set out and the main areas of concern are identified as non-maleficence, ensuring participant safety, protecting privacy and confidentiality, providing referral for support and care, and minimising harm to the research team. Strategies for maximising the benefits of the study are also discussed, including ensuring the work recognises and seeks to minimise the under-reporting of violence and researchers’ responsibility to utilise the interview and its findings, to achieve positive social change. The principle of respect for individuals is discussed in relation to the procedures commonly used to ensure informed and voluntary consent. The principle of distributive justice or the duty to weigh up the risks and benefits of a research project is also identified as having a central role. | en |
dc.identifier.source | The lancet | en |
dc.date.entered | 2002-07-29 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.