Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13629
Record ID: cdb7ab45-0563-4f6f-a6de-5a70dc162be0
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Lisa Aen
dc.contributor.authorCook, Sarah Len
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:07:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:07:46Z-
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.citation12 (11), Novemberen
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13629-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectPsychological abuseen
dc.subjectMental healthen
dc.titleBeyond frequency and severity: development and validation of the brief coercion and conflict scalesen
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid972en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesGeneral Overview:This article presents the development and evaluation of a new psychometric measurement tool, the Brief Coercion and Conflict Scales, in a sample of women incarcerated in the US.<br/ ><br/ >Objective: The article tests the measure’s ability to predict women’s psychological and behavioural or strategic responses to violence, depending on the interpersonal context of their experiences of abuse.<br/ ><br/ >Methods:A literature review is provided, including the strengths and limits of the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). To develop the measures, focus groups have been conducted with female prison inmates who had been battered. Qualitative and quantitative data from 67 pilot interviews are used to refine the measures. The measures’ internal construct validity is evaluated with confirmatory factor analyses in a validation sample of 96 women.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion:Measures are discussed. Measures on violence and its interpersonal context such as intimate partner violence, conflict and coercion dimensions are described. Measures on emotional well being and strategic responses, such as depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress symptoms and strategic responses are included. Pilot study, measurement revision, internal validity of the control and conflict dimensions, confirmatory factor analysis and external validity are analysed.<br/ ><br/ >Conclusions: The findings support the instrument as a viable tool but suggest that further psychometric evaluation of internal and external validity with additional samples will be needed.en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2007-02-15en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing