Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13781 Record ID: 8886fc2b-4f9f-49a5-bab7-d72d206a03ff
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Oehme, Karen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Saunders, Daniel G | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:08:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:08:46Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13781 | - |
| dc.format | 18 p. | en |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | VAWnet Library | en |
| dc.subject | Risk factors | en |
| dc.subject | Family law | en |
| dc.title | Child custody and visitation decisions in domestic violence cases: legal trends, risk factors, and safety concerns (revised 2007)Applied Research Paper Series | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 5719 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://new.vawnet.org/Assoc_Files_VAWnet/AR_CustodyRevised.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Electronic publication | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://new.vawnet.org/category/Main_Doc.php?docid=1134 | en |
| dc.description.notes | General Overview: This short paper reviews the United States (US) literature concerning child custody and visitation decisions where there has been domestic violence. It identifies legal trends and risk factors and makes recommendations aimed at increasing the safety of women and children.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion: The author notes that courts in all US states must consider domestic violence in custody and visitation decisions. Some have introduced reforms to protect victims of violence, such as supervised visitation, exempting battered women from compulsory mediation and making it easier for victims to relocate if necessary to escape violence. However, “friendly parent” provisions (which favour the parent who encourages contact with the other parent) continue to discourage battered women from raising domestic violence claims.<br/ ><br/ >A number of myths about domestic violence still persist, creating risks for women and children. Many professionals continue to believe that the separation of the parents means that the domestic violence has ended. They are overly optimistic about the effectiveness of programs for men who batter. The post-traumatic stress symptoms and depression that victims of violence suffer may be mistaken for borderline and paranoid traits. Negative stereotypes about women lead judges to disbelieve women’s allegations of violence.<br/ ><br/ >The author recommends that men who batter should rarely be awarded sole or joint custody, and makes a number of other recommendations aimed at making visitation safer for the child and adult victim. He also suggests that termination of access needs to be considered more seriously. | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2008-01-10 | en |
| dc.description.physicaldescription | 18 p. | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.