Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13914
Record ID: a2b2b161-d58c-4436-a03f-4f5ec65bfb00
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Sarahen
dc.contributor.authorBastian, Carmelaen
dc.coverage.spatialNationalen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:09:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:09:41Z-
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13914-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Collaboration across child protection and domestic and family violence sectors has been identified as central to responding to complexities experienced by families within these practice fields. However, there is little research that explores how collaboration happens and what outcomes are produced. This paper reports on a study that reviewed 21 case files between 2015 and 2019 to identify the indicators of collaboration when domestic and family violence are present along with child protection concerns, and what activities and processes enable collaborative practice at these intersections. The study found that collaboration is visible in case files through activities such as information sharing, referral, planning, and case conferencing. However, analysis of case notes and discussions with practitioners revealed that these indicators do not necessarily lead to collaboration consistently. The implication for practice is that effective collaboration is fundamentally relational. It is through relationship building between agencies, practitioners, and families that collaboration is enacted. IMPLICATIONS Collaboration between child protection and domestic and family violence practitioners can be identified through indictors such as information sharing, referral, shared case planning, and shared case conferencing.The democratising of practice can be seen most clearly at case conferences where information is shared for decision making to support victims of domestic and family violence.Collaboration becomes compromised when information is shared without purposeful and meaningful linkages between agencies, or without the goals of responsive service pathways for women and children and a common risk assessment of the perpetrator.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Social Worken
dc.titleCollaboration between child protection and domestic and family violence: A case file reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2021.2000627en
dc.identifier.catalogid17216en
dc.subject.readinglistGeneral populationen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2022 February 16en
dc.subject.readinglistNationalen
dc.subject.readinglistIntegrated care and interagency collaborationen
dc.date.entered15/02/2022en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2022 February 16en
dc.subject.anratopicSystems responsesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing