Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13930
Record ID: 5b18b063-0642-4877-8992-92be69455a33
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoss, Caitlinen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:09:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:09:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.issn1034-5329en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13930-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the application and interpretation of the common knowledge rule in common-law evidence jurisdictions in Australia in domestic violence cases. It explores the ways in which the rule shapes the kinds of expert evidence that are admitted in domestic violence cases. It considers the potential admissibility of social framework evidence on these different approaches and argues that statutory reform may be required in order to admit such evidence.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Issues in Criminal Justiceen
dc.titleCommon knowledge in the common law: challenges in domestic violence casesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1829781en
dc.identifier.catalogid16671en
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2020 November 5en
dc.date.entered2020-11-05en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2020 November 5en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing