Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13930
Record ID: 5b18b063-0642-4877-8992-92be69455a33
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Goss, Caitlin | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:09:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:09:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1034-5329 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13930 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the application and interpretation of the common knowledge rule in common-law evidence jurisdictions in Australia in domestic violence cases. It explores the ways in which the rule shapes the kinds of expert evidence that are admitted in domestic violence cases. It considers the potential admissibility of social framework evidence on these different approaches and argues that statutory reform may be required in order to admit such evidence. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Current Issues in Criminal Justice | en |
dc.title | Common knowledge in the common law: challenges in domestic violence cases | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1829781 | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 16671 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | ANROWS Notepad 2020 November 5 | en |
dc.date.entered | 2020-11-05 | en |
dc.subject.list | ANROWS Notepad 2020 November 5 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.