Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13940 Record ID: 6f7061af-251a-404b-b3ca-4238cf372716
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Seidler, Katie | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:09:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:09:51Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | No 2 Vol.: 2 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 18338488 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13940 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Sexual offending has come increasingly to the public agenda in recent decades, although much of the community remains ill-informed about the nature of or risk associated with sexual abuse, such that many people see sex offenders as dangerous and predatory. This has seen a solid political and social push for strategies that aim to control and manage sex offenders in the community. One such strategy is sex offender registration. This article explores the experience of registered sex offenders in New South Wales, Australia through qualitative inquiry involving interviewing convicted and registered offenders in the community. In particular, the experience of offenders will be explored in relation to the registration process and how this affects their ability to manage risks and reintegrate into the community. | en |
| dc.format | Pages 66-76 | en |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Australia and New Zealand Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse (A NZATS A) | en |
| dc.title | Community Management of Sex Offenders: Stigma versus Support | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 12168 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.proquest.com/docview/869444506?accountid=12763 | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sex crimes | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Supervision | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sex offenders | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Medical Sciences - Forensic Sciences | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sanctions | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Reporting requirements | en |
| dc.relation.url | https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.052210567079497 | en |
| dc.description.notes | <p>Sexual offending has come increasingly to the public agenda in recent decades, although much of the community remains ill-informed about the nature of or risk associated with sexual abuse, such that many people see sex offenders as dangerous and predatory. This has seen a solid political and social push for strategies that aim to control and manage sex offenders in the community. One such strategy is sex offender registration. This article explores the experience of registered sex offenders in New South Wales, Australia through qualitative inquiry involving interviewing convicted and registered offenders in the community. In particular, the experience of offenders will be explored in relation to the registration process and how this affects their ability to manage risks and reintegrate into the community. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]<br />Copyright - Copyright Australia and New Zealand Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse (A NZATS A) Feb 2010Document feature - ReferencesLast updated - 2011-06-01ReferencesAndrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2007). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Ohio: Anderson Publishing. 3Ayuso-Mateos, J.L., Pereda, A., Dunn, G., Vazquez- Barquero, J.L., Casey, P., Lehtinen, V., Dalgard, O., Wilkinson, G., Dorwick, C. (2007). Predictors of Compliance with Psychological Interventions Offered in the Community. Psychological Medicine, 37(5), 717-725.Birgden, A. (2007). Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act 2005 (Vic): A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 14(1), 78- 95.Boer, D.R., Hart, S.D., Kropp, R.P., & Webster, C.D. (1997). Sexual Violence Risk 20. Psychological Assessment Resources: Florida.Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.Brantingham, P.J., & Faust, F.L. (1976). A Conceptual Model of Crime Prevention. Crime and Delinquency, 22(3), 284-296.Buckman, J.F., Bates, M.E., & Morgenstern, J. (2008). Social Support and Cognitive Impairment in Clients Receiving Treatment for Alcohol- and Drug-Use Disorders: A Replication Study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69(5), 738-746.Burgess, C., Cornelius, V., Love, S., Graham, J., Richards, M., Ramirez, A. (2005). Depression and Anxiety in Women with Early Breast Cancer: Five Year Observational Cohort Study. British Medicine Journal, 330(7493), 702.Byrne, J.M., & Taxman, F.S. (2006). Crime Control Strategies and Community Change - Reframing the Surveillance vs Treatment Debate. Federal Probation. 70(1), 3-12.Centre for Sex Offender Management (2000). Public Opinion and the Criminal Justice System: Building Support for Sex Offender Management Programmes , Centre for Effective Public Policy: United States.Centre for Sex Offender Management (2008). Legislative Trends in Sex Offender Management. Centre for Effective Public Policy: United States.Collins, J., Noble, G., Poynting, S., & Tabar, P. (2000). Kebabs, Kids, Cops and Crime. Annandale: Pluto Press.Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. (1996). Principles of Effective Correctional Programming, Forum on Corrections Research, 8(3). Correctional Service of Canada.Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., Cullen, F.T., & Andrews, D.A. (2000). The Effects of Community Sanctions and Incarceration on Recidivism. In L.L. Motiuk & R.C. Serin (Eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming, http://www.cscscc. gc.ca/text/rsrch/compendium/2000/indexeng. shtml.Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2000). Cumulating Knowledge: How Meta-Analysis can Serve the Needs of Correctional Clinicians and Policy Makers. In L.L. Motiuk & R. C. Serin (Eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming, http://www.cscscc. gc.ca/text/rsrch/compendium/2000/index-eng.shtml.Gilgun, J. F. (1995). We Shared Something Special: The Moral Discourse of Incest Perpetrators. The Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 265-281.Greer, C. (2003). Sex Crime and the Media: Sex Offending and the Press in a Divided Society. Portland: Willian Publishing.Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.Hanson, R.K., Gordon, A., Harris, A.J.R., Marques, J.K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V.L., & Seto, M.C. (2002). First Report of the Collaborative Outcome Data Project on the Effectiveness of Psychological Treatment for Sex Offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 169-194.Hanson, R.K. & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2005). The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis of Recidivism Studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154- 1163.Hawthorne, G. (2008). Perceived Social Isolation in a Community Sample: Its Prevalence and Correlates with Aspects of People's Lives. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(2), 140-150.Hayes, R., Barnett, M., Sullivan, D.H., Nielssen, O., & Large, M. (2009). Justificati[cut]</p> | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2014-07-21 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | Haymarket | en |
| dc.description.physicaldescription | Pages 66-76 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.