Confidentiality (con;fides) : keeping faith? with whom? Ethics, identification and the socio-legal context of the question of confidentiality for abusive men

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13975

Record ID: 26cc11e5-49a4-4452-a75b-6edf6b03b856

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Rhodes-Little, Andrea	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:10:05Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:10:05Z	-
dc.date.issued	2002	en
dc.identifier.citation	(27), August 2002	en
dc.identifier.issn	1323-2266	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13975	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	Victorian Council of Social Service	en
dc.subject	Legal issues	en
dc.subject	Perpetrators	en
dc.title	Confidentiality (con;fides) : keeping faith? with whom? Ethics, identification and the socio-legal context of the question of confidentiality for abusive men	en
dc.title.alternative	Just policy : a journal of Australian social policy	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	1815	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	National	en
dc.description.notes	This paper discusses the implications of confidentiality when human sciences practitioners work with abusive men. The author argues that providing confidentiality reasserts patriarchal practices of domination and maintains unequal power relations. The protection of the interests of privileged white men and the normalisation of certain criminal behaviour against women, children and men perpetrated by men are addressed. Some suggestions for guidelines directed at the managing of confidentiality are presented.	en
dc.identifier.source	Just policy : a journal of Australian social policy	en
dc.date.entered	2003-05-27	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing