Conflicting consensus: public reaction to a domestic violence pro-arrest policy

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13977

Record ID: 62dba860-f947-488a-8041-374f975a9e87

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Robinson, Amanda L	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:10:05Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:10:05Z	-
dc.date.issued	1999	en
dc.identifier.citation	10 (3), 1999	en
dc.identifier.issn	0897-4454	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13977	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	Haworth Press	en
dc.subject	Theories of violence	en
dc.subject	Criminal justice responses	en
dc.subject	Community attitudes	en
dc.title	Conflicting consensus: public reaction to a domestic violence pro-arrest policy	en
dc.title.alternative	Women & criminal justice	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	2164	en
dc.subject.keyword	International	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.description.notes	Explores public support of the criminalisation of domestic violence due to police pro-arrest policies, through a random phone survey of 403 Alabama (US) residents. Examines the theoretical background of attitudes towards crime and domestic violence, and the effect of class, gender and race on these opinions. These are then compared to the results of the survey. Concludes that females, Caucasians, older respondents, the less-educated and the wealthy were more likely to agree with pro-arrest policies while males, Afro-Americans, younger respondents, the well-educated and the poor were less likely to agree.	en
dc.identifier.source	Women & criminal justice	en
dc.date.entered	2002-01-11	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing