Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14057
Record ID: 74696458-5a84-4aef-86dc-d113a44f4266
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Hsiu-Fenen
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Jordan J.en
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Lauraen
dc.contributor.authorHetling, Andreaen
dc.contributor.authorPostmus, Judy Len
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:10:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:10:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 19, No. 1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14057-
dc.description.abstractThe Family Violence Option (FVO), a provision of the 1996 welfare legislation, allows states to waive certain program requirements for domestic violence (DV) survivors in order to protect them from danger or penalties. The absence of a standardized method for assessing risk and impact has been an impediment to states’ use of the FVO, particularly in the granting of waivers. The purpose of this study was to address this limitation by developing and testing a risk and impact assessment tool for DV survivors applying for waivers under the FVO. Therefore, a collaborative effort between state administrators and researchers was formed which included input from welfare staff and DV advocates. Background research included reviews of validated risk assessments and FVO policies, as well as primary data from focus groups and surveys with staff from the state human services organization, county welfare agencies, and DV organizations. A tool was then created with 131 questions covering demographics, abuse experiences, partner access and risk, perceptions of safety, and emotional health, and piloted in four counties. Two hundred and thirty-seven completed assessments were analyzed using descriptive statistics, principal component analysis, and feedback from assessors. The final tool (n= 95 items) was informed by validated evidence and frontline practice wisdom, recommended to improve FVO utilization and survivor outcomes. From this study, the authors recommend that other states seeking changes to their FVO risk assessment policy and practice explore collaborative partnerships between practitioners and researchers in order to make decisions informed by best practices and systematic research. They should also pursue cross departmental training of risk assessment tools to prevent a siloed approach to FVO implementation.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherIndiana University School of Social Worken
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Social Worken
dc.titleCreating a Tool for Assessing Domestic Violence Risk and Impact Among TANF Clientsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18060/22606en
dc.identifier.catalogid16124en
dc.subject.keywordNotepaden
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordOpen accessen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2020 February 13en
dc.description.notes<p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</p>en
dc.date.entered2020-02-12en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2020 February 13en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing