Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14059
Record ID: 8626895c-609e-423f-968d-86803e5abfa9
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Kelsey Len
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Jacquien
dc.contributor.authorHumphreys, Cathyen
dc.contributor.authorKothari, Anitaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:10:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:10:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 17, Issue 3en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14059-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is limited research on how knowledge translation of a domestic violence (DV) research network is shared. This lack of research is problematic because of the complexity of establishing a research network, encompassing diverse disciplines, methods, and focus of study potentially impacting how knowledge translation functions.<br/ ><br/ >Aims and objectives: To address the limited research, we completed a deliberative dialogue with the following questions: Is there a consensus regarding a coherent knowledge translation framework for a domestic violence research network? What are the key actions that a domestic violence research network could take to enhance knowledge translation?<br/ ><br/ >Methods: Deliberative dialogue is a group process that blends research and practice to identify potential actions. In total, 16 participants attended three deliberative dialogue meetings. We applied a qualitative analysis to the data to identify the key actions.<br/ ><br/ >Findings: The deliberative dialogue facilitated mutual agreement regarding four key actions: (1) agreement on a knowledge translation approach; (2) active promotion of dedicated leadership within an authorising environment; (3) development of sustainable partnerships through capacity building and collaboration, particularly with DV survivors; and (4) employment of multiple strategies applying different kinds of evidence for diverse purposes and emerging populations.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion and conclusions: The use of the deliberative dialogue has uncovered specific factors required for the successful knowledge translation of domestic violence research. These factors have been added to the Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) capacity framework to enhance its application for domestic violence research. Future research could explore these organisational, professional and individual factors further by evaluating them in practice.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherIngentaen
dc.relation.ispartofEvidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practiceen
dc.subjectKnowledge translation and exchangeen
dc.titleCreating an action plan to advance knowledge translation in a domestic violence research network: a deliberative dialogueen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16106634806152en
dc.identifier.catalogid16884en
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 June 15en
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 September 7en
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 March 25en
dc.date.entered2021-03-22en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 June 15en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 March 25en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 September 7en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing