Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14133 Record ID: 72ee2f02-8409-48dd-8e33-86daee7dcca4
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Craven, Zoe | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:11:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:11:06Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 20, December 2004 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1443-7236 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14133 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, UNSW | en |
| dc.subject | Homicide | en |
| dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
| dc.title | Defences to homicide: final report [review] | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse newsletter | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 1254 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/PDF%20files/Newsletter_20.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Victoria | en |
| dc.description.notes | Reviews the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC)’s report which draws together over three years of research and consultation, presents the findings and recommendations of the commission’s examination of defences and partial defences to homicide under current Victorian legislation and provides a model for implementing suggested reforms. Discusses various positions taken by the report’s authors including: that there is little justification for the maintenance of provocation as a partial defence; that certain full defences to homicide be retained, specifically where persons with mentally impaired functioning kill; that the alternative verdict of infanticide remain available to women who kill their children subject to certain legislative changes; and that courts be allowed to consider important antecedents to the actions of the accused. Also mentions the report’s use of a series of case studies to highlight key issues in the sentencing process and the need for reform in this area. Concludes that the VLRC’s work makes a large contribution to the debate over the ability of Australia’s current legal framework to deal with complex social problems. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse newsletter | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2005-04-09 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | Sydney, NSW | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.