Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14134
Record ID: a31530aa-cbb7-41f0-a41b-76e4a7e0688f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKift, Sallyen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:11:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:11:06Z-
dc.date.issued2001en
dc.identifier.citation25 (1), February 2001en
dc.identifier.issn3141160en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14134-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLawbook Coen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.titleDefending the indefensible: the indefatigable Queensland Criminal Code provisions on self-defenceen
dc.title.alternativeCriminal law journalen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1799en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesThis paper discusses Queensland's Criminal Code Amendment Bill (No 2) 1999 regarding the law of self-defence when a person kills a violent partner. A background to criminal law reform and the political circumstances that brought about this amendment are discussed. The application of the existing (February 2001) Qld Criminal Code self-defence stipulations to domestic violence cases is described. It is argued that the requirements of the current provisions, such as immediacy of threat or attack, are inadequate in the context of a history of abuse. A comprehensive analysis of the proposed amendments, including subsections 271 (1), (2) and (3), and section 272 is provided. The author concludes that, although the Amendment Bill is not without fault, it is worthy of careful consideration.en
dc.identifier.sourceCriminal law journalen
dc.date.entered2003-05-30en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing